• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

POLL: Next most pressing BUZifications #3

Started by somebody, January 04, 2012, 18:19:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which routes should become a BUZ next

110 - Inala via Acacia Ridge extended to Richlands
1 (3.4%)
Revised 124/125 to Sunnybank or Garden City via Ipswich Rd
0 (0%)
135 - Griffith Uni, Nathan Campus and parts of Sunnybank/Algester
0 (0%)
169 - UQ Lakes to Eight Mile Plains
0 (0%)
170 - City / busway to Wellers Hill / Logan Rd (Greenslopes)/Broadwater Rd/Newnham Rd to Garden City
1 (3.4%)
175 - Logan Rd full length as far as Garden City
1 (3.4%)
185 - Cavendish Rd full length to Garden City
0 (0%)
204 - Old Cleveland Rd to Carindale then Meadowlands Rd
0 (0%)
210/212 - Stanley Rd, possibly revised
0 (0%)
221 - Wynnum Rd limited stops via Ivory St
1 (3.4%)
227 - Wynnum Rd all stops via Valley
1 (3.4%)
214/215 - Richmond Rd
0 (0%)
230 - Bulimba via Riding Rd and South Bank
7 (24.1%)
231 - Bulimba via Ivory St and Riding Rd
4 (13.8%)
300 - Kingsford Smith Dr to Toombul
0 (0%)
310 - Brighton
0 (0%)
325 - Webster Rd/Chermside/Boondall
0 (0%)
340 - Carseldine via Chermside
3 (10.3%)
350 - Aspley via Beckett Rd and Wardell St
4 (13.8%)
351 - Aspley via Beckett Rd and Kelvin Grove Rd
0 (0%)
359 - Eatonvale
3 (10.3%)
390 - Brookside
1 (3.4%)
425 - Chapell Hill
0 (0%)
Centenary
13 (44.8%)
555 - daytime freeway route
2 (6.9%)
555 - nightime route including 572 route
0 (0%)
something else - please post
2 (6.9%)
375 - Bardon side
1 (3.4%)

Total Members Voted: 29

Voting closed: January 11, 2012, 18:52:01 PM

somebody

Quote from: dwb on January 09, 2012, 18:33:16 PM
Quote from: Simon on January 09, 2012, 11:10:41 AM
Quote from: dwb on January 09, 2012, 09:06:27 AM
I voted for 175.

However I'd like to see a BUZification of a new Paddington to Woolloongabba 386/374. Paddington is sufficiently inner urban enough to warrant more than the 385.
I can't believe that I left off the 375!  Added.

Was wondering about that Simon.... can I revote? Also I only spent one vote, yet it seems closed to me now? I'm not experienced with polls on the forum...
You should be able to remove your vote and recast it.

dwb

Quote from: Simon on January 09, 2012, 18:37:25 PM
You should be able to remove your vote and recast it.

Maybe it is my browser or maybe I'm blind but I can't see the option.... altho I'm pretty sure I've done it once before on a different thread!

This is what it looks like for me...


ozbob

#42
Try it now, I have altered the permissions so you can change your votes ..

Scroll over to the right hand side of the page for the options ...
Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X   Mastodon  BlueSky

somebody


Gazza

Its a pretty big area not serviced by one. About equivalent in size to Parkinson/Algester.

175 would be my 3rd choice after Centenary and Bulimba....Its the kind of route I like. Simple and direct.

dwb

Quote from: ozbob on January 09, 2012, 18:52:54 PM
Try it now, I have altered the permissions so you can change your votes ..

Scroll over to the right hand side of the page for the options ...

Thanks Bob, the little "remove vote" link was there and I re-cast my vote.

I voted for 175 (again) and 375. I also believe Bulimba is in dire need and I'd be happy with any of these three.

I should note however, I voted for the 375 imperfectly as I've previously highlighted the good one seat nature through to the valley and desired changes to the wasteful peak shuttle 374 (of course I realise the network shouldn't be full of one seaters, however I think this is a reasonable one). Paddo would also be a shorter route and hit the highly activated land uses without all day long going from MacGregor Tce to the turnaround in Carwoola St in Bardon. Altho that is closer to where I live it is lowly patronised given the demographic and I think the length would get A LOT more bang for buck by continuing from King George Square to Woolloongabba via Cultural Centre, South Bank and Mater Hill.

I think the Stafford side of the 375 route is also highly patronised, however I'm not sure if you'd BUZ it as is, or do something with the 376 instead.

longboi

Quote from: dwb on January 10, 2012, 10:44:24 AM
I think the Stafford side of the 375 route is also highly patronised, however I'm not sure if you'd BUZ it as is, or do something with the 376 instead.

The Stafford Rd section particularly has quite a bit of medium to high intensity development along the corridor and could easily support a BUZ. Whether it should stay as is through Gordon Park and join the busway at Lutwyche or continue to the end of Stafford Rd and join the busway at Kedron Brook is another question.

somebody

Quote from: nikko on January 10, 2012, 11:45:26 AM
Quote from: dwb on January 10, 2012, 10:44:24 AM
I think the Stafford side of the 375 route is also highly patronised, however I'm not sure if you'd BUZ it as is, or do something with the 376 instead.

The Stafford Rd section particularly has quite a bit of medium to high intensity development along the corridor and could easily support a BUZ. Whether it should stay as is through Gordon Park and join the busway at Lutwyche or continue to the end of Stafford Rd and join the busway at Kedron Brook is another question.
I think stay as it is beyond RBH.

dwb

Quote from: Simon on January 10, 2012, 12:01:31 PM
Quote from: nikko on January 10, 2012, 11:45:26 AM
Quote from: dwb on January 10, 2012, 10:44:24 AM
I think the Stafford side of the 375 route is also highly patronised, however I'm not sure if you'd BUZ it as is, or do something with the 376 instead.

The Stafford Rd section particularly has quite a bit of medium to high intensity development along the corridor and could easily support a BUZ. Whether it should stay as is through Gordon Park and join the busway at Lutwyche or continue to the end of Stafford Rd and join the busway at Kedron Brook is another question.
I think stay as it is beyond RBH.

It will be one of the only all stops local services won't it? not on the busway that is...

somebody

I thought it was using the busway at least as far as the Federation St overpass.

dwb

Quote from: Simon on January 10, 2012, 12:37:12 PM
I thought it was using the busway at least as far as the Federation St overpass.

But I think no further... still to be all confirmed of course mid year when the thing opens

longboi

Quote from: dwb on January 10, 2012, 12:48:11 PM
Quote from: Simon on January 10, 2012, 12:37:12 PM
I thought it was using the busway at least as far as the Federation St overpass.

But I think no further... still to be all confirmed of course mid year when the thing opens

There was/is (Not sure if its still happening) a portal planned for Lamington Av, Lutwyche after Lutwyche station. If it was to use the busway beyond Federation St, this would be where it would join the regular road network.

SurfRail

Quote from: dwb on January 10, 2012, 12:48:11 PM
Quote from: Simon on January 10, 2012, 12:37:12 PM
I thought it was using the busway at least as far as the Federation St overpass.

But I think no further... still to be all confirmed of course mid year when the thing opens

In practice, all buses on Gympie Road will be using the secton of "busway" from Truro Street inbound to Federation Street and it will only be a question of which bus stops are serviced. 

I wouldn't be surprised if the 375 went through the Lutwyche Station.  (However, my prediction is we will end up with some silly split system a little bit like the LCT, with the 376 going via the station and the 375 going via the surface.)
Ride the G:

somebody

^ LCT = Lane Cove Tunnel?  Most of the irregularities with that have been sorted regarding Hillsbus, at least in peak.

SurfRail

Quote from: Simon on January 12, 2012, 16:37:53 PM
^ LCT = Lane Cove Tunnel?  Most of the irregularities with that have been sorted regarding Hillsbus, at least in peak.

Eastern Busway vs OC Road yellow stops is closer to what I meant, but the LCT arrangement would be physically closer to what Lutwyche will probably end up with.
Ride the G:

🡱 🡳