• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

Ferny Grove

Started by ozbob, November 28, 2010, 07:14:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Overall performance for 2010.  Consider timetable, congestion, parking, stations, and bus integration.

4 or less
4 (36.4%)
5
1 (9.1%)
6
3 (27.3%)
7
1 (9.1%)
8
2 (18.2%)
9
0 (0%)
10
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 11

ozbob

Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X  Threads  Mastodon  BlueSky

#Metro

#1
Good
Actually quite good in peak hour with services.


Improve
Increase the frequency of service in peak and off peak hours.
Bus interchange at Enoggera is not being properly used to integrate the network with buses.
This is a shame because the roads in that area congest and hold up buses.
Opportunity for cross-town services has been passed up

Duplication to Ferny Grove required. Stopping and waiting for another train to pass is very annoying.
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

BrizCommuter

Quote from: tramtrain on November 28, 2010, 08:22:05 AM
Good
Actually quite good in peak hour with services.


You think that multiple peak gaps of 20 minutes or more (between Windsor and Gaythorne) are good?
The Ferny Grove timetable is abysmal for many inner-city stations, and is discouraging public transport use.

The same goes for 20 minute plus gaps on the Cleveland and Beenleigh Lines.

#Metro

This is just my personal opinion of that line.
I haven't used the service ex Gaythorne or Windsor.

For the record, no gaps are not good. Just to clarify and dispel any misunderstanding.
But overall, I like the FG line.
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

ozbob

Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X  Threads  Mastodon  BlueSky

🡱 🡳