• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

Timetabling: Frequency or on time?

Started by #Metro, September 21, 2010, 22:56:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which is more important to you at peak hour?

I value on time running more
1 (12.5%)
I value frequency more
6 (75%)
About the same
1 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Voting closed: September 26, 2010, 22:56:55 PM

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

#Metro

September 21, 2010, 22:56:55 PM
 :)
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

somebody

#1
September 22, 2010, 09:22:28 AM
I also value not having to endure unnecessary dwells at stations or running more slowly than necessary between stations!

Golliwog

#2
September 22, 2010, 09:50:32 AM
Well you would have loved my Ferny train last night, it got to Central early, but just left 7 minutes ahead of schedule.

Frequency is more important to me. If its frequent, then theres no worry if you train is running late or even cancelled, there will be another along shortly.
There is no silver bullet... but there is silver buckshot.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

somebody

#3
September 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Quote from: Golliwog on September 22, 2010, 09:50:32 AM
Well you would have loved my Ferny train last night, it got to Central early, but just left 7 minutes ahead of schedule.
For the record, I wouldn't love that at all.  I'd rather the fat be squeezed out of the timetable.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions
🡱 🡳