ARA - The Costs of Commuting: An Analysis of Potential Commuter Savings

[ozbob]

--> http://www.ara.net.au/UserFiles/file/Publications/15-01-REPORT-Commuter-costs-potential-savings-report-FINAL_Electronic.pdf

[ozbob]

http://www.ara.net.au/UserFiles/file/Media%20Releases/20_01_15_Public%20transport%20to%20save%20Australian%20commuters%20up%20to%20%2410000%20a%20year.pdf

ARA Media Release

Public transport to save Australian commuters up to $10,000 a year
20 January 2015

A national review of annual commuter costs has found that Australians could save an average of $9,973 every year simply by travelling to work with public transport instead of owning and driving a car or purchasing a second household car.

'The Costs of Commuting: An Analysis of Potential Commuter Savings' Report, prepared by the Australasian Railway Association (ARA), identifies the annual cost to commute by car and then uses two scenarios to quantify the potential savings a public transport commuter could make by not driving a private vehicle.

The scenarios estimate potential savings for those who use public transport and do not own a car or have not purchased a second household car and those who own a car but opt to leave it at home.
ARA CEO, Bryan Nye OAM, said the start of a New Year brings new resolutions, with many Australians looking for ways to save money and change old habits.

"This report highlights just how costly it can be to drive your car to work five days a week and in doing so provides a practical solution for many Aussies looking to kick off 2015 saving their hard earned money," said Mr Nye.

"A lot of people are unaware of the significant savings that can be made by selling their car or simply not purchasing a second household car and switching to public transport. A driver of a larger vehicle, like a Holden Commodore, could save more than $12,600 annually while the driver of a smaller vehicle, like a Mazda 2, could save about $6,400.

"Even commuters who choose to own a car but leave it at home and take public transport can still save," he said.

Conservative calculations have been used to identify the car commuter costs. Non-compulsory car insurance has not been costed while only $1,000 for a whole year of parking has been included.

"The potential savings are obviously dependent on individual circumstances but when you consider that Australian CBD parking costs can range from $180 to $750 a month or $2,160 to $9,000 per year, the savings that can be made by jumping on a train or bus are significant," Mr Nye continued.

"Of the 9.8 million Australians in the workforce, 60 per cent drive to work, causing road congestion in our cities that increases carbon emissions and accidents, and is also set to cost the Australian economy $20.4 billion annually by 2020.

"An added benefit of commuting by public transport is the productive use of time that public transport offers, allowing commuters to spend time on their laptop, mobile, iPod and so on whilst in transit," Mr Nye concluded.

The Report found that Brisbane and Melbourne commuters have the highest costs to own and commute to work by car compared with those in other capital cities, the reason for this is attributed to higher registration, fuel and servicing prices.

This also means that commuters in these two cities can save the most amount of money by not owning a car and taking public transport instead, saving an average of $10,375 and $10,778 each year respectively.

The full report can be found on the ARA website here > http://www.ara.net.au/UserFiles/file/15-01-REPORT-Commuter-costs-potential-savings-report-FINAL.pdf

[#Metro]

Probably true for a commuter making one journey into the CBD and one journey out, 9-5 pm worker. Hence why PT mode share during peak hour is quite good.

But the world is bigger than this. ARA and others focus on the peak because that is the easiest to analyse and best defined.

Not everybody works in the CBD. Some people need to make cross town trips. The value of lost waiting time not taken into account during off peak. Many areas don't have good PT at all. Many services are not direct and waste time, which reduces the benefits.

In general, a trip by PT in the off peak generally takes 2x more time than by car I have found, exception being busway services to/from the CBD.

Improved network planning will see more people being able to access the savings.

[ozbob]

Business Spectactor --> Australia's train to nowhere

[hU0N]

Some good commentary on this very report over at The Urbanist.

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/theurbanist/2015/01/21/why-do-commuters-drive-to-work-instead-of-taking-transit/

[#Metro]

Sometimes the boss gives free parking
Then there is the poor PT in areas which are low density / high road complexity which aren't good for PT

But I think PT is much broader than just 'commuters', should be for all day general purpose use. Main problem is that as a general rule of thumb, PT takes 2x as long as in a car. And time is the least renewable resource. This comes down to connections, speed and frequency.

[Jonno]

Sometimes the boss gives free parking
Then there is the poor PT in areas which are low density / high road complexity which aren't good for PT

But I think PT is much broader than just 'commuters', should be for all day general purpose use. Main problem is that as a general rule of thumb, PT takes 2x as long as in a car. And time is the least renewable resource. This comes down to connections, speed and frequency.

This exactly why urban form and accessibility is equally if not more important than mobility.  As Jeff Speck outlines in his book if we make our cities compact, walkable mixed use communities then accessibility is increased significantly and results in greater transit use.  A good transport plan is a great land use/urban design plan!!!.

[newbris]

I manage to save another $1500 on top of the public transport savings by cycling to work. Possibly more if you take into account gym fees, reduced health costs etc. Commute time is faster than car.