• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

Cultural Centre Congestion

Started by #Metro, January 26, 2010, 12:36:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

#Metro

I agree Jonno.

I think the BUZ buses are the main all day product and thus should stay on the busways.
Everything else non-BUZ should be progressively shoved off it. So things like ...  I don't know, pick a random example, 214 or 212 or 172- illegible and low frequency routes should be done away with.

I know Simon and I are at polar opposites on this, but leaving infrequent illegible routes on the busway is a downgrade IMHO.
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

dwb

Quote from: tramtrain on February 01, 2012, 09:45:52 AM
I agree Jonno.

I think the BUZ buses are the main all day product and thus should stay on the busways.
Everything else non-BUZ should be progressively shoved off it. So things like ...  I don't know, pick a random example, 214 or 212 or 172- illegible and low frequency routes should be done away with.

I know Simon and I are at polar opposites on this, but leaving infrequent illegible routes on the busway is a downgrade IMHO.

I see little reason why if appropriate bus priority existed in other locations, that you couldn't redistribute so that the inner section of SEB was BUZ only. Rockets etc would go via REX/Storey Bridge/Other.

ozbob

Went through the Cultural Centre around 6.15pm inbound 130.  Bus jam from QSBS across the bridge to the Cultural Centre.
Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X   Mastodon  BlueSky

somebody

I saw that as well.  It was backing up from the Melbourne St portal enough to prevent buses from being able to access the platforms freely.

🡱 🡳