P111/P66?

[Gazza]

Only a brief question, but any reason the 111 and 66 aren't 100% prepaid?

[somebody]

IMO - No.  They wouldn't pre pay a BUZ apparently.  Notice the 222 go de-pre paid on becoming a BUZ, even though (I believe) there are AVVMs at the busway stations and alternate BUZ service at every other stop.

[Gazza]

I think blanket rules like that are silly. If it is Busway only then there is no reason for drivers to sell tickets.

And 66 isn't a BUZ.

[Golliwog]

IMO - No.  They wouldn't pre pay a BUZ apparently.  Notice the 222 go de-pre paid on becoming a BUZ, even though (I believe) there are AVVMs at the busway stations and alternate BUZ service at every other stop.

Yes, both the new EB2 busway stations have AVVMs. Stones Corner I believe has 1 down on the concourse below the platforms, while Langlands has one on each platform.

[SurfRail]

IMO - No.  They wouldn't pre pay a BUZ apparently.  Notice the 222 go de-pre paid on becoming a BUZ, even though (I believe) there are AVVMs at the busway stations and alternate BUZ service at every other stop.

Not at Kismet Street, which for some absurd reason is not a stop for the 200 (although in practice I would bet it is).

[somebody]

IMO - No.  They wouldn't pre pay a BUZ apparently.  Notice the 222 go de-pre paid on becoming a BUZ, even though (I believe) there are AVVMs at the busway stations and alternate BUZ service at every other stop.

Not at Kismet Street, which for some absurd reason is not a stop for the 200 (although in practice I would bet it is).

Good point.  Forgot about that one.  I'd be happy to force cash payers on to the 204 though.