• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

Article: Suburban freight corridor on cards

Started by ozbob, March 25, 2010, 12:28:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ozbob

From the Courier Mail 25th March 2010 page 25

Suburban freight corridor on cards




Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X   Mastodon  BlueSky

Jon Bryant

Both the dedicated freight line (must use Gateway Motorway easment not the windy mountain route through East Brisbane) and the Trout Road rail line are well and truely overdue.  Just wish the Minster would openly back the need for them and suport rail.  She is almost to afraid to announce these great plans.

#Metro

Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

O_128

Trout road rail line is much better than a stupid road, If the freight line is built it would negate the need for a third line on the Cleveland line as the current track could be electrified
"Where else but Queensland?"

somebody

Quote from: Jonno on March 25, 2010, 12:43:55 PM
Both the dedicated freight line (must use Gateway Motorway easment
I'm not sure there's much reason to do this.  The Port of Brisbane has functions for connecting Brisbane and west with the sea, but the ports to the north of Brisbane are far better.  Moreton Bay is too shallow to be attractive to dock at unless you really have to.

Is there a rail terminal between the Brisbane River and the next decent port?  (I'd suggest Bundaberg?)  Even if so, does traffic warrant a new river crossing?

tomato

 Has there actually been some offical announcement recently about  " the dedicated freight line " to the Port of Brisbane ?

   Googling " Connection SEQ 2031 " & looking in the dpi.qld...... websites didn't pop up any recent drafts/ updates to the 2009 - 2031 plan ... ::)

🡱 🡳