• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

CityGlider and 77

Started by #Metro, June 12, 2010, 13:30:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

#Metro

Does anyone have any info about the 77 bus or CityGlider passenger numbers of late?
Its been a while now since they were established, just curious to know what people thought of the service.
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

ButFli

Anecdotal evidence is that the CityGlider is doing alright (but nothing like the 199) and the 77 is lucky to to get 3 passengers at once.

#Metro

 ;) Thanks

Still have my gripes about CityGlider and the number of stops.
As for 77, the tunnel isn't well used either. Maybe Clem7 will go bankrupt if traffic does not pick up in the next year or so?
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

somebody

77 - Was a nice idea, and I'm not opposed to them trying it
CityGlider - Why are we still running around the 192 and eastern part of the 470?  Just make it all stops east of "Light St Depot" and west of Boundary St and we don't need to.  Pre-paid would be an arguable point.

As for the UQ extension of the 192, that would be better done by selected 199s anyway.

Golliwog

I was catching the 111 from inbound at around 9.30-10am on Monday and had a 77 behind following. Saw at least a dozen passengers hopping on along the busway before we left it behind as my bus wasn't picking up as many.
There is no silver bullet... but there is silver buckshot.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

🡱 🡳