• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

What is your opinion on the proposed maroon cityglider?

Started by #Metro, January 31, 2012, 11:12:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

What is your opinion on the proposed maroon cityglider?

Oppose
21 (87.5%)
Support
2 (8.3%)
Abstain
1 (4.2%)

Total Members Voted: 24

Voting closed: February 02, 2012, 11:12:05 AM

#Metro

Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

SurfRail

The sole redeeming feature of this service is that it does not enter the city.

I for one would be happier if they sent it to the RBWH via Kangaroo Point, an area which is not known for its high frequency.

But, I would prefer even more that they get the outer BUZ network fixed first.
Ride the G:

O_128

Quote from: SurfRail on January 31, 2012, 11:32:46 AM
The sole redeeming feature of this service is that it does not enter the city.

I for one would be happier if they sent it to the RBWH via Kangaroo Point, an area which is not known for its high frequency.

But, I would prefer even more that they get the outer BUZ network fixed first.


Great buses running down stanley street, just what is needed, Not going to langlands park, not using busway stations, Being useless and pandering to those dipsh%t "I need a seat to everywhere"
"Where else but Queensland?"


somebody

Quote from: dwb on January 31, 2012, 20:24:00 PM
BUZ 374 (or half 375) makes more sense.
+ infinity to the half of 375 bit.  Putting that in KGSBS with coordination would also significantly improve service to Paddington.

dwb

Quote from: Simon on February 01, 2012, 10:39:49 AM
Quote from: dwb on January 31, 2012, 20:24:00 PM
BUZ 374 (or half 375) makes more sense.
+ infinity to the half of 375 bit.  Putting that in KGSBS with coordination would also significantly improve service to Paddington.

Yes, I think it should exist on INB/SEB to Woolloongabba.

I know CCBS is an issue, but this would be one of the 10ish routes I would keep via CCBS in any redraft.

Golliwog

I support it, in theory. The way they propose it now, just plonking it in on top of the existing routes is what I have an issue. If this was part of a general reshuffle of the city stops and various routing, then maybe. But just as an additional route, no I do not.
There is no silver bullet... but there is silver buckshot.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

🡱 🡳