• Welcome to RAIL - Back On Track Forum.
 

Melbourne Monorail

Started by #Metro, February 17, 2016, 04:14:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

#Metro

Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

ozbob

Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X   Mastodon  BlueSky

ozbob

Half baked projects, have long term consequences ...
Ozbob's Gallery Forum   Facebook  X   Mastodon  BlueSky

BrizCommuter

Ha, ha.

However it should be noted that existing transport corridors such as motorways are a good alignment for monorails, which can be built above the central reservation or above the embankment. Aside from foundations, construction can be quick due to pre-fabrication, though traffic lanes would have to be closed during construction. As the route would be along motorway for the majority of the route, there is small chance of this idea being a viable transport option.


#Metro

Does monorail have the same footprint as say elevated LRT?
Negative people... have a problem for every solution. Posts are commentary and are not necessarily endorsed by RAIL Back on Track or its members.

SurfRail

Quote from: BrizCommuter on February 17, 2016, 16:02:59 PM
Ha, ha.

However it should be noted that existing transport corridors such as motorways are a good alignment for monorails, which can be built above the central reservation or above the embankment. Aside from foundations, construction can be quick due to pre-fabrication, though traffic lanes would have to be closed during construction. As the route would be along motorway for the majority of the route, there is small chance of this idea being a viable transport option.

For the Airport to Southern Cross it certainly would be, as long as they would deliver a reasonable operating cost.  It would at least avoid taking up capacity on the metropolitan rail network that could be better used in other ways.

Maybe have a stop at Essendon Fields as well, particularly if they can deliver a 15 minute or less journey time.
Ride the G:

BrizCommuter

Quote from: LD Transit on February 17, 2016, 16:57:30 PM
Does monorail have the same footprint as say elevated LRT?

Monorails would have a slightly smaller footprint and more minimal structure, though I would expect an emergency walkway would be required between tracks. There are also metro alternatives designed for minimalist overhead structures, such as Alstom Axonis which has 1.6m diameter supports. 

verbatim9

Quote from: BrizCommuter on February 17, 2016, 16:02:59 PM
Ha, ha.

However it should be noted that existing transport corridors such as motorways are a good alignment for monorails, which can be built above the central reservation or above the embankment. Aside from foundations, construction can be quick due to pre-fabrication, though traffic lanes would have to be closed during construction. As the route would be along motorway for the majority of the route, there is small chance of this idea being a viable transport option.
Citi Link will collect the tolls from the Monorail portion above the freeway. So all good! for current contracts and Citilink. Cash Cow

SurfRail

It's an interesting point.  As far as I'm aware the idea that the Citylink contract prevents rail to the airport is something of a myth, but I'm not sure how much (ie would a route following the Tulla invoke some kind of compensation procedure as opposed to building via Sunshine and Albion-Jacana).  Maybe they would be interested in building something if they could do it cheap and get a good return on it.
Ride the G:

🡱 🡳