RAIL - Back On Track
September 11, 2010, 01:19:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Latest:
MEDIA RELEASES click here!
HOT TOPICS:
Citizens' Public Transport Forum
New Fare Strategy
Go Card & TransLink fares
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Articles Login Register CPTF TransLink QR My Go Card CRR  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Beenleigh to Ipswich  (Read 369 times)
tramtrain
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3107


Intergrated public transport vision for Brisbane


« on: March 13, 2010, 02:28:06 PM »

Just an idea I had. Why do we have the running patterns we do today? Historical accident? Convenience for the network planners? Some other reason?

There is a lot of traffic that originates on the SE Freeway and uses the Expressway to arc around the river and go to places like Milton, Toowong and Indooroopilly.

One idea would be to have Beenleigh line trains go via the CBD (ICRCS) and then onto Roma St & the Ipswich line to directly compete with the SE Freeway. A direct bus route skipping cultural centre could also be considered.


Logged

“New ideas pass through three periods: 1) It can’t be done. 2) It probably can be done, but it’s not worth doing. 3) I knew it was a good idea all along!” — Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Posts are my independent commuter view- not RailBOT's or other party.
somebody
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2435


« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2010, 03:23:44 PM »

I have no idea at all why you are proposing this.  Something like Sunnybank-Richlands might make some sense, but Manly-Richlands would be better.  Substitute Corinda for Richlands before Richlands opens.

EDIT: I was think of via Tennyson here.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2010, 11:34:03 AM by somebody » Logged

Rail should outrun road.
stephenk
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397


Location: Land of reality


« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2010, 03:49:30 PM »

Oh dear, daft idea of the week.

The reason that running patterns are as they are:
-Most people travel between the suburbs and the CBD.
-It is operationally simple to run trains through the CBD, North to South and South to North with paired lines.
-The line pairings avoid conflicting moves.

By the way, where in the ICRCS does it suggest that a Beenleigh Line train access the Ipswich Line without having to reverse (and thus block a track for 10mins)?
Logged

Evening peak service to Enoggera* 2007 - 7tph
Evening peak service to Enoggera* 2010 - 4tph
* departures from Central between 16:30 and 17:30.
mufreight
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1121


« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2010, 02:25:35 AM »

Please explain where a Beenleigh line train would have to reverse to access the Ipswich line.
Logged
curator49
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 36


« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2010, 07:04:56 AM »

Why is a Beenleigh to Ipswich and a Cleveland to Ipswich (and points in between) service a stupid idea?

There are quite a number of people that do that journey (probably many more than what I am imagining). I am sure that if such a service with a suitable frequency was offering it would be used by more and more people and get more cars off the road.

I think the biggest issue though is a lack of track capacity/capability for the additional train services.

About ten years ago I would catch the first train inbound at Sunnybank at 5:30 am travel to Yeerongpilly then catch the Yeerongpilly/Tennyson/Corinda train to Corinda then an Ipswich train at Corinda.

Getting off at Ipswich I would then walk across the David Trumpy bridge to work. Arrival at work was about 7:10 am. When the bus was substituted for the Corinda shuttle and there was a requirement for me to start work by 6:00 am, I started driving, and have done ever since.
Logged
tramtrain
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3107


Intergrated public transport vision for Brisbane


« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2010, 09:48:58 AM »

I was trying to mirror the large traffic flow that occurs when cars spill out of the SE Freeway, onto the Riverside Expressway, on to Coronation drive to work in Milton, Auchenflower, Toowong, Taringa, UQ and Indooroopilly.

There are 2 ideas:

Option A
Beenleigh line
CBD via ICRCS (modified)
Roma Street
Ipswich Line

Option B
Beenleigh line,
Tennyson
Ipswich Line
CBD


Rather than planning train routes based on constraints in the system, my idea was to make trains match the bulk routes that people travel and modify the network to accomodate that. The network is supposed to be built to serve the people, not the other way around.
Logged

“New ideas pass through three periods: 1) It can’t be done. 2) It probably can be done, but it’s not worth doing. 3) I knew it was a good idea all along!” — Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Posts are my independent commuter view- not RailBOT's or other party.
somebody
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2435


« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2010, 10:41:17 AM »

Please explain where a Beenleigh line train would have to reverse to access the Ipswich line.
It would if it was Beenleigh to Ipswich via the CBD.
Logged

Rail should outrun road.
mufreight
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1121


« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2010, 02:36:22 PM »

The preferable options are that one service per hour off the Beenleigh line operate via Tennyson into and out of the CBD, as a link service a similar service be operated Clevland to Ipswich via Tenyson, this would provide a link for commuters from the Clevland line, and the Beenleigh line to the Ipswich line saving the present extended trip times through the CBD and would resolve the problems of the present failure of connections between services from the Gold Coast and Ipswich line services.
Logged
tramtrain
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3107


Intergrated public transport vision for Brisbane


« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2010, 04:06:47 PM »

One could consider running 3 car trains or high floored LRT services- depends on what the demand is like during peak hour.
Logged

“New ideas pass through three periods: 1) It can’t be done. 2) It probably can be done, but it’s not worth doing. 3) I knew it was a good idea all along!” — Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Posts are my independent commuter view- not RailBOT's or other party.
somebody
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2435


« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2010, 04:48:01 PM »

The preferable options are that one service per hour off the Beenleigh line operate via Tennyson into and out of the CBD,
I don't like this idea particularly.  If you mean 1/hour Beenleigh-city via Tennyson and 1/hour Beenleigh via South Bank, what would service Yeerongpilly-Dutton park, or are they only getting an hourly frequency?

Thinking some more about this, there's nowhere I am aware of between Manly and Park Rd to turn trains around besides Manly, so a Manly-Ipswich line service would involve a lot of low patronage running.  Also, that would not pick up the Coasties unless they returned to stopping at Yeerongpilly off peak, and it's not too bad to change at Roma St for such commutes.  I actually think that a Sunnybank-Richlands service would make some sense, but the lack of wires on the 4th track would be a big problem to do this in peak.  If Richlands receives only 2tph off peak to the city, that could be supplemented by 2tph to Sunnybank with a change at Darra for the city.  It also picks up Coopers plains which makes sense for interchange with the Coasties. 

Of course, I am assuming that a Sunnybank turnback exists!  Altandi would be even better.
Logged

Rail should outrun road.
tramtrain
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3107


Intergrated public transport vision for Brisbane


« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2010, 04:58:18 PM »

Just during peak hour for a start to test.
Beenleigh or Kuraby --->Tennyson --->Ipswich Line
Logged

“New ideas pass through three periods: 1) It can’t be done. 2) It probably can be done, but it’s not worth doing. 3) I knew it was a good idea all along!” — Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Posts are my independent commuter view- not RailBOT's or other party.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2010, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!